Saturday, April 11, 2020

Effective Writing - Using An Excellent Sample Essay To Prove Yourself

Effective Writing - Using An Excellent Sample Essay To Prove YourselfIf you have an impressive undergraduate degree, even if you did not receive a first or second-rate grade on your Wharton undergraduate college coursework, there is still hope for you. In order to improve your grades and achieve better personal and academic success, you can use your Wharton undergraduate college sample essay as a guide and application to real-life situations and circumstances.By using sample essays from students who are doing well academically, you will be able to identify which questions are the most pressing. You will also be able to test yourself against these samples. Some of the questions may require you to utilize a certain type of writing and you will find it helpful to read their sample essays before you begin to work on your own.You will need to be sure that you outline all of your thoughts in a way that is easy to follow and complete outlines and sub-headers to break up the writing process. The more you pay attention to the forms and components of a sample essay, the more you will see yourself. Sample essays should give you a good idea of how you will write, format, and structure your own Wharton undergraduate college sample essay. The more you study the samples, the better prepared you will be when you begin the actual writing of your own undergraduate college coursework.After you have an idea of how you will structure and format your essay, you should take the time to examine a variety of sample essays by students who have done well at Wharton University. Ask the professors of any of the courses that you have taken whether they have any additional sample essays. The best thing to do is find your subject matter, the school's interests, and your general area of interest, and then get a hold of a Wharton college sample essay. These essays usually come with a template.After you have done this, you should take the time to analyze the samples and determine which sample es says apply to your situation and interests. You can find a variety of sample essays online, and in books as well. Make a point of looking through all of them and finding a sample that matches your situation and interests. You will want to write this sample essay after you have been completing your Wharton undergraduate college coursework.Once you have written your Wharton undergraduate college sample essay, you will need to start filling in the blanks. Make sure that you remember the major points, your plan of action, and the methods that you are going to use. Your work in the sample essay should provide you with clear ideas of the key things that you are expected to accomplish. This will serve as your roadmap as you go through your final Wharton undergraduate college coursework.Finally, you should complete your Wharton undergraduate college coursework with a writing sample that closely matches the format of the sample essays you have used to get started. This will help you get the most out of your writing experience. There is no substitute for experience and you should always be prepared to prove yourself. The samples may only give you a starting point for your writing, but your own analysis of your own academic and personal life experiences will help you realize the power of this kind of composition.

Saturday, April 4, 2020

Dualism Essays - Ontology, Philosophy Of Mind, Mindbody Problem

Dualism I believe that the popular or "ghost in the machine" form of substance dualism best solves the mind body problem. My views in this area have been influenced by my twelve years of Catholic education. The soul, or mind, depending on your level of belief, was a complete and separate entity and was the center of a human being. The body was an ambulatory device that the soul directed. The idea that the mind is a separate entity and that it is independent of the physical body is the central point of substance dualism. Churchland explains that substance dualism claims that the mind is a distinct nonphysical thing, a complete nonphysical entity that is independent of any physical body to which it is temporarily attached. Any and all mental states and activities, as well as physical ones, originate from this unique entity. Substance dualism states that the real essence of you has nothing to do with your physical body, but rather from the distinct nonphysical entity of the mind. The mind is in constant interaction with the body. The body's sense organs create experiences in the mind. The desires and decisions of the mind cause the body to act in certain ways. This is what makes each mind's body its own. The popular or "ghost in the machine" form of substance dualism states that a person is a "ghost in a machine", the ghost being the mind or spirit and the machine is the body. Within this description, the mind/spirit controls the body and is in intimate contact with the brain. The brain would be the nexus between the mind and body. The popular form of substance dualism was adopted after the difficulties of Cartesian dualism could not be overcome. Rene Descartes stated that the nonphysical and the physical could not interact. This became a problem in dualism since the nonphysical mind needed to interact with the physical body. These difficulties provided a motive for the move to popular substance dualism. The first major argument for substance dualism is religion. Each of the major religions place belief in life after death that there is an immortal soul that will survive death. This very closely resembles substance dualism. The mind can be substituted for the immortal soul. In fact the two are almost interchangeable. This argument is primarily the basis for my own belief in substance dualism. My personal experiences as a religion student give me insight into this argument. The second major argument for substance dualism is irreducibility. This points to a variety of mental phenomena that no physical explanation could account for what is going on. An example would be the quality and meaningful content of human thoughts and beliefs. These things cannot be reduced to purely physical terms, hence irreducibility. This is also another good argument that I can understand from personal experiences. I cannot reduce my reactions and feelings toward how a steak tastes to a mathematical equation. This is the same idea. The final argument for substance dualism is parapsychological phenomena. Mental powers such as telepathy, precognition, telekinesis, and clairvoyance are all near impossible to explain within the boundaries of physics and psychology. These phenomena reflect the nonphysical and supernatural nature that dualism gives to the mind. Because I believe in these phenomena, it seems logical to me that parapsychology is an excellent argument for substance dualism. These arguments give a good basis for a philosopher to believe in substance dualism. However there are also serious arguments against it. The first major argument against dualism is simplicity. Materialists state that because their view is simpler (they only believe in one thing- that which is physical) it is more rational to subscribe to their view. The materialist point of view is also easier to prove because there is no doubt that physical matter exists, while nonphysical matter is currently a hypothesis. This argument seems very illogical to me. Philosophical views should be chosen because one makes more sense to you, not because one has a smaller number of ideas within it. The second major argument against substance dualism is explanatory impotence. Materialists can explain anything physical through scientific study, whereas dualists can explain nothing because no theory has ever been formulated. Churchland says, "...dualism is less a theory of mind than it is an empty space waiting for a genuine theory of mind to be put in". I see one flaw with the materialist theory here. The mind in the dualist theory may use a form of energy transfer not yet discovered by science. Centuries ago, undiscovered forms