Sunday, August 18, 2019
Oedipus the King :: Classics
Oedipus the King    "Oedipus the King" Essay    Oedipus Rex lived his life knowing the fate to which he was destined.  He tried at all costs to avoid Apollo's prophecies; however, this only  led him to a state of tragedy and despair. This outcome made it  justifiable for the educated reader to label him as a "tragic hero."  Oedipus' obvious identification made it all the more difficult to  investigate the question as to whether there could be more than one  "tragic hero" per novel. The supporting characters of Jocasta and  Laius were possibilities, and in the following paragraphs, their  likeness to a figure of tragedy will be expressed.    The character of Laius had already died the moment the play began,  however, because his presence played such a significant role in the  novel, the reader was still able to determine a great deal about him.  The biological father of Oedipus had been the reigning king and he  lived in riches with his wife Jocasta in wealth and riches. This state  of prosperity eventually was transformed into a pathetic end when he  was killed in the street by his own son. This fulfills the first  property of a tragic hero. Laius also experiences pain that had been  partially self-inflicted. He sent his son, Oedipus, away to be killed  at an early age, and in the end, it was this discarded son that killed  him. Laius then must have realized that this "pain" was the result of  allowing others to do his dirty work. If he had had the courage to  kill the infant himself, then the misfortune of dying at the hand of  his son would have been avoided. Not wanting to sway from the  stereotypical traits of a king, Laius exhibited a pride that was  largely displayed in the situation that had him killed. Instead of  leaving the road for Oedipus to pass, he insisted on maintaining his  stature and he "tried to push [Oedipus] off the road" (p.56). This is  more specifically defined as "hubris", and is another essential  characteristic of a tragic figure. Similar to the unyielding pride of  a king, is the expression of one's mind at the expense of his own  body. Again, the crossroads situation can be used, as can the general  nature of a typical king, a personality from which Laius did not sway.  The preceding two points illustrate the main flaw of Laius, King of  Thebes. It has many times been proven that pride can be one's  downfall, and the existence of this trait in Laius' personality, and  the fact that it was this that killed him, prove that he experienced    					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.